Publication Date
October 2022
Author(s)
Sammie Wicks, Jennifer Zeunik, Frank Straub, Elyse Hansen, John Donahue, and John Sullivan
Abstract
The purpose of NPI’s independent review of the Metropolitan Police Department’s (MPD) protest threat assessment process is to determine whether threat assessments conducted by MPD have been or are influenced by bias when planning for and executing a response to First Amendment demonstrations. The legislation specifically requested that the study utilize arrest data, public and officer injury data, type of injury reports, fatality numbers, officer deployment data, tactical and type of weaponry used, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) terrorist watchlist data to determine if and how MPD responses varied. NPI’s team worked to gain access to and review all available data regarding MPD responses to first amendment demonstrations to determine if bias played a role in MPD threat assessments from January 2017 – January 2021, and to provide recommendations for mitigating bias in the threat assessment process and producing a report that captures the information.
Research Design
Non-experimental
Research Methods
Secondary data analysis
Recommended Citation
Wicks, S., Zeunik, J., Straub, F., Hansen, E., Donahue, J., & Sullivan, J. (2022). A study of bias in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department’s threat assessment process. Arlington, VA: National Policing Institute. https://www.policinginstitute.org/publication/a-study-of-bias-in-the-washington-d-c-metropolitan-police-departments-threat-assessment-process/
Strategic Priority Area(s)
Topic Area(s)
Contact
For general inquiries, please contact us at info@policinginstitute.org
Share
Strategic Priority Area(s)
Topic Area(s)
Contact
For general inquiries, please contact us at info@policefoundation.org
Share